Are we going to get in trouble? - Printable Version
+- Breast Growth For Genetic Males (https://www.breastnexum.com)
+-- Forum: Related Subjects (https://www.breastnexum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Forum: Transgender (https://www.breastnexum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=53)
+--- Thread: Are we going to get in trouble? (/showthread.php?tid=17703)
+- Breast Growth For Genetic Males (https://www.breastnexum.com)
+-- Forum: Related Subjects (https://www.breastnexum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Forum: Transgender (https://www.breastnexum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=53)
+--- Thread: Are we going to get in trouble? (/showthread.php?tid=17703)
Pages:
1
2
Are we going to get in trouble? - Samantha Rogers - 28-01-2014
Has anyone else noticed? The bio male part of Breastnexus now has more than twice the postings of any other section of the site. LOL
RE: Are we going to get in trouble? - Lisa Lou - 28-01-2014
You know my two word reply, sis... F 'em!
RE: Are we going to get in trouble? - Samantha Rogers - 28-01-2014
Well, maybe, Sis, but Eve has done us all a huge, over the top favor allowing us this resource... I would not want to alienate her or appear anything less than hugely grateful, you know? And, so far as breast growth goes, we do frequently stray a little far... off topic? Tee hee.
RE: Are we going to get in trouble? - SarahSchilling - 28-01-2014
I noticed the same thing myself about the post counts. Don't worry about it, though. If Eve was upset about it, we'd know by now. Anyhow, wouldn't making a gender identity sub-section be a sign that we're allowed to stray from the topic of growing breasts a bit?
I'm hoping she's more of a "Watchmaker Mod". lol, I wonder how many will get the deist reference.
RE: Are we going to get in trouble? - Lisa Lou - 28-01-2014
(28-01-2014, 06:47 PM)Samantha Rogers Wrote: Well, maybe, Sis, but Eve has done us all a huge, over the top favor allowing us this resource... I would not want to alienate her or appear anything less than hugely grateful, you know? And, so far as breast growth goes, we do frequently stray a little far... off topic? Tee hee.
Point taken sister, I am duly chastened and do not want to appear as an ungrateful bitch. My bad.
RE: Are we going to get in trouble? - Samantha Rogers - 28-01-2014
Lisa _ No, I did not want to hush anyone...far from it... I was just thinking I might write her something and thank her.
Sarah...I hate to admit to being dense, tee hee. Can you enlighten me?
RE: Are we going to get in trouble? - Miranda-nata-est - 28-01-2014
It crossed my mind in the midst of the wee small hours last night that when I looked at 'new posts' there were always a high proportion of Bio Male postings - coincidence or what?
I would add my thanks to the hosters - you of course have the mosters
RE: Are we going to get in trouble? - SarahSchilling - 28-01-2014
(28-01-2014, 07:07 PM)Samantha Rogers Wrote: Sarah...I hate to admit to being dense, tee hee. Can you enlighten me?
Deists believe in a creator that's totally hands off. In other words, he/she/it created the universe and set things into motion, then stepped back. Kind of like a watchmaker who makes a watch, winds it, and stays out of the way.
So, at the time, this view of God became known as the "Watchmaker God". The religion was popular during the Enlightenment, and several of the founding fathers were Deists....some more open about it than others.
RE: Are we going to get in trouble? - Samantha Rogers - 28-01-2014
As a sort of "lapsed agnostic", I don't find that too far off my own thinking. Interesting.
Thanks, Sis!
RE: Are we going to get in trouble? - GoneGirl - 28-01-2014
well, if worse comes to worst, money talks.
(mixed emotions)Clara