Would this surprise you about PM? - Printable Version
+- Breast Growth For Genetic Males (https://www.breastnexum.com)
+-- Forum: Methods (https://www.breastnexum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=64)
+--- Forum: Pueraria Mirifica (https://www.breastnexum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=76)
+--- Thread: Would this surprise you about PM? (/showthread.php?tid=19659)
+- Breast Growth For Genetic Males (https://www.breastnexum.com)
+-- Forum: Methods (https://www.breastnexum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=64)
+--- Forum: Pueraria Mirifica (https://www.breastnexum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=76)
+--- Thread: Would this surprise you about PM? (/showthread.php?tid=19659)
Would this surprise you about PM? - Lotus - 21-02-2014
I've found this statement in researching:
The activity of phytoestrogen is much weaker than the steroidal estrogen, varying from 0.005-2%
Or this:
The standardized PM extract contains 20 mg miroestrol / 100 g. That equates to 0.2 mg / g, and since about 100 mg of PM is used per dose, the end result is 0.02 mg miroestrol / 100 mgs PM.
I use to have the estrogen activity of PM, I can't find now!
, I have a couple of references but not what I had, so why is it so hard to find? Anybody?
RE: Would this surprise you about PM? - Lotus - 21-02-2014
(21-02-2014, 03:40 AM)Mistress~Lotus Wrote: I've found this statement in researching:
The activity of phytoestrogen is much weaker than the steroidal estrogen, varying from 0.005-2%
Or this:
The standardized PM extract contains 20 mg miroestrol / 100 g. That equates to 0.2 mg / g, and since about 100 mg of PM is used per dose, the end result is 0.02 mg miroestrol / 100 mgs PM.
I use to have the estrogen activity of PM, I can't find now!
Anybody?
So why I this important?, for starters we should've known in the first place!
RE: Would this surprise you about PM? - Destiny - 21-02-2014
Is this a good thing or a bad thing I am lost... but trying to understand!
RE: Would this surprise you about PM? - annabolton - 21-02-2014
smart people
RE: Would this surprise you about PM? - Samantha Rogers - 21-02-2014
Well we all know Sammie is more than a little slow, but I am also confused dear guru...we know all phytos are weaker than animal based E, but is this way weaker or way stronger than we expected or what?
C'mon, baby and don't tease Sammie...
RE: Would this surprise you about PM? - Lotus - 21-02-2014
(21-02-2014, 04:46 AM)Davidhasbreasts Wrote: Is this a good thing or a bad thing I am lost... but trying to understand!
From cost to effectiveness I would say it's huge, say that our PM, other then what's reported on the supplement section of the bottle which is reported as Puerarin .69 mg., what does that reflect in terms of Estrogen activity.
The standardized PM extract contains 20 mg miroestrol / 100 g. That equates to 0.2 mg / g, and since about 100 mg of PM is used per dose, the end result is 0.02 mg miroestrol / 100 mgs PM.
According to what is reported out there!
Convert the ratio-
RE: Would this surprise you about PM? - Destiny - 21-02-2014
so at this rate I am taking .4mg of miroestrol when taking 2000mg of PM.
When I was taking 4000mg I was getting .8mg miroestrol.
just found a site saying that pm is 3000 times more potent than soy. Also has some useful information for beginners.
http://mustgrowbust.com/2012/pueraria-mirifica-for-men
RE: Would this surprise you about PM? - Lotus - 21-02-2014
(21-02-2014, 05:03 AM)Mistress~Lotus Wrote:(21-02-2014, 04:46 AM)Davidhasbreasts Wrote: Is this a good thing or a bad thing I am lost... but trying to understand!
From cost to effectiveness I would say it's huge, say that our PM, other then what's reported on the supplement section of the bottle which is reported as Puerarin .69 mg., what does that reflect in terms of Estrogen activity.
The standardized PM extract contains 20 mg miroestrol / 100 g. That equates to 0.2 mg / g, and since about 100 mg of PM is used per dose, the end result is 0.02 mg miroestrol / 100 mgs PM.
According to what is reported out there!
Convert the ratio-
Give up?
RE: Would this surprise you about PM? - Samantha Rogers - 21-02-2014
(21-02-2014, 05:14 AM)Mistress~Lotus Wrote:(21-02-2014, 05:03 AM)Mistress~Lotus Wrote:(21-02-2014, 04:46 AM)Davidhasbreasts Wrote: Is this a good thing or a bad thing I am lost... but trying to understand!
From cost to effectiveness I would say it's huge, say that our PM, other then what's reported on the supplement section of the bottle which is reported as Puerarin .69 mg., what does that reflect in terms of Estrogen activity.
The standardized PM extract contains 20 mg miroestrol / 100 g. That equates to 0.2 mg / g, and since about 100 mg of PM is used per dose, the end result is 0.02 mg miroestrol / 100 mgs PM.
According to what is reported out there!
Convert the ratio-
Give up?
Yes please!
RE: Would this surprise you about PM? - Lotus - 21-02-2014
(21-02-2014, 05:09 AM)Davidhasbreasts Wrote: so at this rate I am taking .4mg of miroestrol when taking 2000mg of PM.
When I was taking 4000mg I was getting .8mg miroestrol.
.08
Sorry David, lotus has a head cold!
4g