[Samantha Rogers]

Tee hee...see why I don't like labels?

We are so alike in a lot of ways, honey. I just think my female voice may be somewhat louder than yours, at least right now. Samantha can be downright demanding lately, and she is often positively screaming for release.
By the way, my comments were not meant to diminish males, but rather to point out my belief that much of what was being discussed was not limited by gender but by individual character regardless of physical sex. I am an equal opportunity wacko. I still believe positive, negative whatever...exists on both sides of the gender divide, and that, in fact, the divide itself may be nothing but an arbitary construct first created in ancient times to assist survival, but carried on now strictly from social habit. Should have come with an expiration date. Tee hee
I have read that the reason men tend to be unfaithful while women tend not to be has to do with evolutionary survival. A woman increases the odds of her genes surviving but protecting her offspring, since she can only procreate once a year. A male, on the other hand, can produce offspring as often as he can find partners, thus ensuring the continuation of his line by frequent encounters. Men are thus biologically programmed to be promiscuous. Gender roles, I think, came to be in much the same way. But today, that is, biologically, obsolete.
Overcoming, those stereotypes is if interest to me.