09-08-2014, 11:33 PM
(09-08-2014, 05:56 PM)squirrelwithboobs Wrote:(09-08-2014, 05:55 AM)Missed Miss Wrote: Well, if you're going to go that way, you could include "Silence Of The Lambs" and, "Caligula", because there's a scene where he dresses like a woman.
to me those movies,including the crying game,just paint a bad light for what it is to be a transsexual/transgendered person. in my humble opinion it makes us all look like nymphomaniac sexual deviates. i am no prude by any means, however, such propagada further enhances the 'shemale' ( i detest that word btw) or non-op porn and perceived 'exotic/riske'' nuance of being with us girls. i do not wish to be objectified as a sexual object, much like most women of the genetic persuasion, dont want to be seen as a possesion and/or being cheapened by freely available porn..
dont get me wrong, i enjoy being intimate with a person i care about, but the eyes tell the truth whether it is strictly sexual or something more special and worthwhile...reciprocation of emotions/feelings .....a bond which will outlast sexual intmacy...
a hard find indeed.....
I know what you mean! I've heard others mention the same thing, especially about "Lambs"!! I hate the shemale title, too. Well, what I hate worse is when they call them chicks with dicks, like they were born girls, they just had dicks instead of vaginas. Wellllll.....that's a GUY!!!! What they do is grow their tits and do what they can to look like girls, so, they SHOULD be called guys with tits!! Lol. But, NOOOOO, a guy having sex with another guy with tits is just liked being gay!!!!! However, a guy having sex with a girl with a dick is perfectly okay!!!!!! No matter HOW gay it still is!!!! (Not that I have ANYTHING against people being gay!!) It's just this bullshit male machismo that says it's okay to fuck a "girl" with a dick, but not a guy with tits!! IT'S THE EXCACT SAME THING!!!! You can call them pancakes or you can call them flapjacks, but they're STILL the exact same thing!!!!
As for the scene in Caligula, it's been a few years since I've seen it, but I recall a scene where he dresses like a girl in order to sneak into a place where women run around half naked all the time, or something liked that.


. i am no prude by any means, however, such propagada further enhances the 'shemale' ( i detest that word btw) or non-op porn and perceived 'exotic/riske'' nuance of being with us girls. i do not wish to be objectified as a sexual object, much like most women of the genetic persuasion, dont want to be seen as a possesion and/or being cheapened by freely available porn..