Shop for herbs and other supplements on Amazon
(advertisement)


Low dose more effective than expected!
#16

(08-01-2015, 02:43 PM)SensualTiffany Wrote:  Lotus- so a revised recommendation for PM would be to stay at low doses? I'm just starting out and taking 500mg per day. Should I plan on seeing the effect for...say 30 days and assess?

Previous info made me think I should be ramping up to 2,000mg per day as my body got used to it. But reading the article, I'm thinking that lower dose will be the way to go.

Thoughts?

It's hard to predict the individual response when considering metabolism, everyone's different. The question is (or should be) if taking high dose's work, where's the proof it does?, show the pics of a C or D cup on 2500+ mg of PM, or for that matter HRT. There might be a few, but compared to the majority??, the science already knows it's not possible, maybe it's time we should start to listen to it.

(09-06-2014, 08:16 PM)Lotus Wrote:  
Why increasing the dosage doesn't always work


Negative feedback occurs when the result of a process influences the operation of the process itself in such a way as to reduce changes. Feedback can produce stability and reduce the effect of fluctuations. Negative feedback loops in which just the right amount of correction is applied in the most timely manner can be very stable, accurate, and responsive.

Negative feedback loops have been compared to a thermostatically controlled temperature in a house, where the internal temperature is monitored by a temperature-sensitive gauge in the thermostat. If it is cold outside, eventually the internal temperature of the house drops, as cold air seeps in through the walls. When the temperature drops below the point at which the thermostat is set, the thermostat turns on the furnace. As the temperature within the house rises, the thermostat again senses this change and turns off the furnace when the internal temperature reaches the pre-set point.

Negative feedback loops require a receptor, a control center, and an effector. A receptor is the structure that monitors internal conditions. For instance, the human body has receptors in the blood vessels that monitor the pH of the blood. The blood vessels contain receptors that measure the resistance of blood flow against the vessel walls, thus monitoring blood pressure. Receptors sense changes in function and initiate the body's homeostatic response.

Read more: Homeostasis - Negative feedback - Body, Blood, Internal, and Conditions - JRank Articles http://science.jrank.org/pages/3365/Homeostasis.html#ixzz34AWy8WWP

____________________________________________________________

Cycling is important when taking supplements, failure to do so will result with tolerance, and the supplements will stop working.

Once your body makes the adjustments to get back to homeostasis is the time to cycle, (ie. in a 7 day plan, try 5 days on and 2 days off).


Tolerance occurs when the person no longer responds to the drug in the way that person initially responded. Stated another way, it takes a higher dose of the drug to achieve the same level of response achieved initially, and then cycle begins to try and recreate that initial response, and good luck cause it won't work.
Reply


Shop for herbs and other supplements on Amazon
(advertisement)


Messages In This Thread
Low dose more effective than expected! - by Jaded Jade - 06-01-2015, 02:35 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Misty0732 - 06-01-2015, 03:52 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Jaded Jade - 06-01-2015, 05:18 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Mindy2017 - 06-01-2015, 10:57 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 06-01-2015, 11:50 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Misty0732 - 07-01-2015, 12:05 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Jaded Jade - 07-01-2015, 03:07 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 07-01-2015, 06:02 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Mindy2017 - 08-01-2015, 05:21 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 08-01-2015, 06:45 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 07-01-2015, 12:12 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by SensualTiffany - 08-01-2015, 02:43 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 08-01-2015, 02:56 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 08-01-2015, 07:12 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Scotti - 10-01-2015, 01:38 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by b.rose - 08-01-2015, 04:22 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 08-01-2015, 06:23 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 08-01-2015, 07:19 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Jaded Jade - 09-01-2015, 01:56 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 11-01-2015, 12:32 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Misty0732 - 11-01-2015, 05:41 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 11-01-2015, 11:35 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by b.rose - 12-01-2015, 11:38 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by EvaMarie - 12-01-2015, 01:14 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by GoneGirl - 12-01-2015, 11:28 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by JosephineDreams - 13-01-2015, 01:58 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 13-01-2015, 03:35 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by b.rose - 13-01-2015, 01:38 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Scotti - 15-01-2015, 10:46 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 13-01-2015, 04:23 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 14-01-2015, 01:40 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by b.rose - 14-01-2015, 02:35 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by ElainMoria - 15-01-2015, 11:42 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Misty0732 - 15-01-2015, 11:50 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by ElainMoria - 16-01-2015, 12:03 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Candace - 16-01-2015, 04:42 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Jaded Jade - 17-07-2015, 11:25 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by julieTG - 18-12-2015, 02:45 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by jannet.duff - 18-12-2015, 05:25 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 18-12-2015, 05:43 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by julieTG - 18-12-2015, 05:57 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 18-12-2015, 06:01 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by julieTG - 06-01-2016, 11:32 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 07-01-2016, 12:33 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Shop for herbs and other supplements on Amazon
(advertisement)


Breast Nexus is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.


Cookie Policy   Privacy Policy