Shop for herbs and other supplements on Amazon
(advertisement)


Low dose more effective than expected!
#29

B.Rose

That's an interesting approach, and thanks for sharing, how long have you been doing it?, have you had any results so far? or pics to share?.

How does your endo approach target tissues?, is oral E or transdermals prescribed?. I found some studies that Estradiol (only) was administered without androgens, which they showed was effective in results compared to that of the control group that had AA's administrated.

The labs you shared are in the free state, which for our lay people, that's the hormones that are active and able to interact with receptors. SHBG is a carrier protein, which will be about 64%(roughly), albumin represents about 33%(again roughly), and it has the potential to become active into the free state. Free T is at about 2-5% this is the active kind and available to interact with target tissue and activate cell growth.

On the GnRh agonists approach, did you get an additional surge of T (flare up?). The fda has a warning posted about Triptorelin although its also administrated for GID too, other conditions too (although the costs appear very high). Insurance companies regard this as experimental, which most likely adds to the cost.

Adrenal androgens can be converted through the androstenedione pathway, DHEA and DHEAS , sort of a back door imo (although there is such a thing).

I do have a less than $10.00 alternative (maybe) for GnRH, any guesses?. The correct answer gets you 5 free skips, (wait, that's internet music lol).
____________________________

Josephine

3-6 drops = 120-240 mg (1 drop is 40 mg)
http://www.breastnexus.com/showthread.php?tid=19659&page=6

____________________________

Clara, that's not good odds, I wonder what the NBE stats would be. So that means "roughly" up to 60% don't make it to a C-cup?, assuming having B-cups wouldnt be adequate, I dunno.
Reply


Shop for herbs and other supplements on Amazon
(advertisement)


Messages In This Thread
Low dose more effective than expected! - by Jaded Jade - 06-01-2015, 02:35 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Misty0732 - 06-01-2015, 03:52 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Jaded Jade - 06-01-2015, 05:18 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Mindy2017 - 06-01-2015, 10:57 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 06-01-2015, 11:50 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Misty0732 - 07-01-2015, 12:05 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Jaded Jade - 07-01-2015, 03:07 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 07-01-2015, 06:02 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Mindy2017 - 08-01-2015, 05:21 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 08-01-2015, 06:45 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 07-01-2015, 12:12 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by SensualTiffany - 08-01-2015, 02:43 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 08-01-2015, 02:56 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 08-01-2015, 07:12 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Scotti - 10-01-2015, 01:38 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by b.rose - 08-01-2015, 04:22 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 08-01-2015, 06:23 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 08-01-2015, 07:19 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Jaded Jade - 09-01-2015, 01:56 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 11-01-2015, 12:32 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Misty0732 - 11-01-2015, 05:41 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 11-01-2015, 11:35 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by b.rose - 12-01-2015, 11:38 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by EvaMarie - 12-01-2015, 01:14 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by GoneGirl - 12-01-2015, 11:28 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by JosephineDreams - 13-01-2015, 01:58 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 13-01-2015, 03:35 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by b.rose - 13-01-2015, 01:38 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Scotti - 15-01-2015, 10:46 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 13-01-2015, 04:23 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Lotus - 14-01-2015, 01:40 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by b.rose - 14-01-2015, 02:35 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by ElainMoria - 15-01-2015, 11:42 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Misty0732 - 15-01-2015, 11:50 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by ElainMoria - 16-01-2015, 12:03 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Candace - 16-01-2015, 04:42 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by Jaded Jade - 17-07-2015, 11:25 AM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by julieTG - 18-12-2015, 02:45 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by jannet.duff - 18-12-2015, 05:25 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 18-12-2015, 05:43 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by julieTG - 18-12-2015, 05:57 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 18-12-2015, 06:01 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by julieTG - 06-01-2016, 11:32 PM
RE: Low dose more effective than expected! - by The First Aria - 07-01-2016, 12:33 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Shop for herbs and other supplements on Amazon
(advertisement)


Breast Nexus is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.


Cookie Policy   Privacy Policy