01-04-2015, 04:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-04-2015, 04:54 PM by TibetanPrincess.)
Also, I've noticed some of you think Gynecomastia was nature-given, that's obvious denial.
Gynecomastia is caused by environmental toxins as well as pharmaceutical exposures.
It goes against the grain of nature. No healthy male would ever have actual developed or even partially developed breasts.
I have also noticed the comments regarding the reason one originally took PM and found "their true gender" should have been to be female. This is rather tricky, you see, if I were to take testosterone simply to boost my muscle tone, there's a fine line, if I were to continue such a path, I would find myself eventually more masculine biochemically and perhaps some more rewiring in the brain I didn't expect. Other than being more daring and fearless, with higher sex drive, i just might be thinking I should have been male, especially if it's been a fantasy or something I have always felt inside but never really addressed it.
I would think that would be my real reason subconsciously for taking testosterone, not so much because I wanted to boost muscle/burn fat, etc.
I believe some of you experiment with things like PM subconsciously the same way and may be in denial about it. It at least gives you a reason to keep going on the journey.
If that's the case on rewiring, can you imagine the confusion brought on by environmental/pharmaceutical toxins and even exposure during congenital phase???
Where do each of you fall as far as where you see yourselves on the inside? What do you wish was on the outside to match?
Simply the Female sex: has a vagina.
Biologically feminine: genetic expression of female attributes (such as breasts, hips curvy but or frame, facial features Etc.)
Superficially Feminine: how a woman would typically express themselves socially (hair, makeup, clothing, etc.)
Just an outsiders thoughts.
As for me being a genetic girl, all of these are check marked.
Gynecomastia is caused by environmental toxins as well as pharmaceutical exposures.
It goes against the grain of nature. No healthy male would ever have actual developed or even partially developed breasts.
I have also noticed the comments regarding the reason one originally took PM and found "their true gender" should have been to be female. This is rather tricky, you see, if I were to take testosterone simply to boost my muscle tone, there's a fine line, if I were to continue such a path, I would find myself eventually more masculine biochemically and perhaps some more rewiring in the brain I didn't expect. Other than being more daring and fearless, with higher sex drive, i just might be thinking I should have been male, especially if it's been a fantasy or something I have always felt inside but never really addressed it.
I would think that would be my real reason subconsciously for taking testosterone, not so much because I wanted to boost muscle/burn fat, etc.
I believe some of you experiment with things like PM subconsciously the same way and may be in denial about it. It at least gives you a reason to keep going on the journey.
If that's the case on rewiring, can you imagine the confusion brought on by environmental/pharmaceutical toxins and even exposure during congenital phase???
Where do each of you fall as far as where you see yourselves on the inside? What do you wish was on the outside to match?
Simply the Female sex: has a vagina.
Biologically feminine: genetic expression of female attributes (such as breasts, hips curvy but or frame, facial features Etc.)
Superficially Feminine: how a woman would typically express themselves socially (hair, makeup, clothing, etc.)
Just an outsiders thoughts.
As for me being a genetic girl, all of these are check marked.

