I'm having trouble with this one... I read through the study and it doesn't pass the smell test.
The study leaves a lot to be desired, and I'm having doubts about the journal that published it.
The study states that surgically altered breasts were omitted, but they sure used a lot of fake boobs in their pictures. The comparison pic of american, french, and south korean breasts was particularly ludicrous - like they purposefully chose the least appealing french breasts that they could find, and put them up against a DDD augmentation! On the plus side, the references are hilarious, for a scholarly paper!
I searched for The Journal of Female Health Sciences... no joy.
I searched for the 1st author's institution; New Delhi School of Applied Sciences, doesn't exist either...
-j
The study leaves a lot to be desired, and I'm having doubts about the journal that published it.
The study states that surgically altered breasts were omitted, but they sure used a lot of fake boobs in their pictures. The comparison pic of american, french, and south korean breasts was particularly ludicrous - like they purposefully chose the least appealing french breasts that they could find, and put them up against a DDD augmentation! On the plus side, the references are hilarious, for a scholarly paper!
I searched for The Journal of Female Health Sciences... no joy.
I searched for the 1st author's institution; New Delhi School of Applied Sciences, doesn't exist either...
-j