05-11-2017, 09:07 PM
(05-11-2017, 08:22 PM)Myranda Wrote:(05-11-2017, 05:39 PM)microstring Wrote: Do not agree with you! A man who wants to have only a woman's breasts is an autogynephile, not a transsexual...
Based upon the definition provided above, I would strong advocate for the fact that you are wrong, dead wrong. If for no other reason, than the fact that your limited view on the world fails to address the fact that many here, myself included are sexually attracted to woman, not men and not ourselves.
I wonder who else, other than myself and a few like Myranda, find it odd, that a few people try to "Pigeonhole" the Pigeonholes??? It' was bad enough for me to wake up to the fact that a crossdresser is NOT necessarily a Transgender nor a Transexual, but many are, including myself. A casual CD does not wish to grow boobs or a broader "beam" just to fill out dresses and such. But I feel that when in the mood, I must! There is a big difference than just removing pads, and breast forms and having to care for the breasts and hips during showers and when not in a femme frame of mind. That's what makes me different from having a fetish. IMHO
Why then, is it wrong for a man to "just want boobs" then deny he is NOT part of the Transgender Community? I think it's unnecessary to have sub classes for sub class of a term we all should try to understand and accept. Not to make up excuses for what we consider our short comings or perceived short comings.
I am truly sorry that I have helped Highjack this thread. I will back out and turn off notifications .

