[Shirazmn]

I think that "sissy" deserves a better definition. The stuff that you wrote at the beginning of the thread is a very specific path and it's about a sex-driven porn-induced change in one's sexuality that would also affect their gender. I like to keep gender and sexuality very separated because they are very different.
I won't exclude that someone may have discovered their true gender by watching shemale porn. The internet has done a great deal in introducing the option of "being trans" to people. If and how much this is a good thing I'll leave it to another conversation. 

What I am arguing about is that the definition of "sissy" is not that of a transitioning woman but that of an effeminate man. So, as far as I understand reading all the script in the sissy hypno videos and captioned images online, "sissification" does NOT lead to womanhood but to beta-manhood. It's a legit fetish but, again, I think that it's a degrading one and not a constructive one. It's degrading for the person that will consider himself a lesser male. It's degrading for a culture where white men are usually considered weaker because less "big" than black men. And it's degrading for women because the image of "woman" that is used is a grotesque representation of a c*m-dump and a sex object to which a beta-male should aspire to look like in order to allure to stronger men.

I understend the fascination with this fetish. It's forced feminization in full effect. And that "forced" frees the feminized man from all responsibilities in his feminization.
You can be a sissy all you want and enjoy degradation and humiliation all you want, but sissification is no way to turn a male into a woman.