12-09-2022, 08:43 AM
(11-09-2022, 11:00 PM)Siman234 Wrote:That's interesting... I haven't thought about measuring volume/weight like that as it feel like its quite difficult to do. I dunno, perhaps I'll try. The mehtod I've been using is to measure from middle of the chest to below armpit where bra underwire sits approximately, then from the underboob crease to below collarbone where the breast tissue starts. For me its a bit tricky as my root is wide and tall so its bit hard to tell the exact point. But doing this and comparing to approximate volume on sister size charts have gotten me very close. For me the calculators also mess up and they give far too big cupsizes. I'm about 52" over 39" with tape being quite tight, I noticed this gives quite accurate reading on ABTF, seems like its slowly getting more accurate, I guess because more breasts means less error due to my upper back being wide and also Tanner 4 second mound areolas can make an error. So yes, more boobs = close accuracy on calculators.(11-09-2022, 12:07 PM)HelloDiDi Wrote: Not all bras are alike, so your 38D might be smaller than usual... Also calculators can be tricky.
EDIT:
How did you come up with that calculation? How exactly did you measure? You did volume and used that to estimate weight? I'm curious because I've done quite a lot of work to figure out breast volumes, that's how I figure out both growth and cup size and that's been so far much more accurate method than any calculator. Calculators tend to over estimate my cup size very often.
So that number I pulled was from dipping my breasts into a full bowl of water, measuring the water that fell out, and multiplying that by 0.9 to get a very ballpark guess at mass. Gives me 1.19 kg for both, which aformentioned website said is around the mass of chests around the size of 38B based on comparing by pure mass.
I also have my measure of bust over band, 44.5 over 37.5, which, using calculators, is 38G, but that's obviously an overestimate too.
I guess it might be possible I just have no volume yet? I feel some has come on in recent months, but, yeah. Still conical shaped.
Another question, you said you ended up lowering your injection amount a little bit to get better effects. Out of curiosity, what are your troughs and schedules looking like for your injections/blood tests? Right now I'm bouncing between 250pg/ml and 350pg/ml on a 10 day cycle... may experiment pulling it down a bit to see if the skin conditions go away. Have to research that.
Will note, I am on no testosterone suppression medication at all. I stopped cypro. All I'm using as evidence of that is all the sex drive and production factors you can measure suppressed testosterone by.
Yes I dropped down on 0,07ml/2,8mg per 3,5 days as a test. Previously I dropped from 0,10ml to 0,08ml for the same reason. Your levels seem fine. I might raise a bit to get the lower point to around 300 pg/ml, but that's just me. For me somewhat higher levels seem to work just fine. Right now I'm trying to find my sweet spot and I think I can lower a bit from where I've been. But what ever you feel is right, for you lower could work, its so individual on where the best levels are. There's no one size fits all solution to this.
You can sure do that if you can do that. I have tried to stop cypro, but my T is so stubborn, I just can't do monotherapy, it just doesn't work. I would love to have some nicer blocker, but cypro is the cheapest easiest choice for me and the only realistic one. If going mono works for you, go ahead, its simple and easy that way. I so much wish I could, but my body has decided that its just impossible.

