Yesterday, 09:50 AM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 09:58 AM by Heaven's Night.)
One more thing about the term genetic male I forgot to add... Its weird, because is there a non genetic male in existence? Or a non genetic female?
Because keep in mind, that the body changes from HRT are genetic, our bodies always obey the genetic makeup we inherited and we all carry "the code" of the other sex within our genetics, the changes that occur are natural. Albeit from exogenous artificially induced hormone balance. But even the hormones we use are these days almost all bioidentical, as have the same makeup as naturally produced hormones have.
So, is anyone who changes their sex characteristics with hormone tweaking becoming a "non genetic" male or female? Obviously not. I am not aritificial or non genetic because I'm helping my body to grow the sex characteristics it could not do without a fully female hormone balance. But that will not make my body "non genetic" in any way because it is exactly the genetics I carry which allows me to grow big curves and it has made me shorter, changed my eye colour, my hairline, my skin, even the way my skin diseases flare up has changes. My body odour is different, my genitals function differently, HRT reactivated my mensturation and my cycle is like clock work. Am I not then a "genetic female" as the changes have been exogenously given a helping hand?
This is why I think the forum title is problematic. But there is nothing better to replace it, and the term genetic male makes sense in the context we're using it here. The problem is wrong interpretation or malicious use as in trying to get me off the forum as I am not a "genetic male" in the context most are who say they are. But my male characteristics are obviously genetic, goddamn this is so funnily conflicting. lol.
The point being, when debating about human biology, we're complex as fuck and it gets more obscure and strange more closely you look. Especially when it goes to level of genetics which is insanely complex system, I have only surface level and vague understanding of genetics as its such a huge subject. Lotus understands it way better, I miss her badly, she would give such great explanations to all this kinda science geek stuff, I'm sure.
And in case someone wants to categorise trans people as non genetic... There's a nice reply to that.
![[Image: ?u=http%3A%2F%2Fartulino.net%2Ffotogaler...37ed5205d7]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fartulino.net%2Ffotogaleria%2Fteksty%2F270%2F007d.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=3f3c3c9d880c4897b8168ef9db7176e5ad0e4dc83a3ed675b8331f37ed5205d7)
Because keep in mind, that the body changes from HRT are genetic, our bodies always obey the genetic makeup we inherited and we all carry "the code" of the other sex within our genetics, the changes that occur are natural. Albeit from exogenous artificially induced hormone balance. But even the hormones we use are these days almost all bioidentical, as have the same makeup as naturally produced hormones have.
So, is anyone who changes their sex characteristics with hormone tweaking becoming a "non genetic" male or female? Obviously not. I am not aritificial or non genetic because I'm helping my body to grow the sex characteristics it could not do without a fully female hormone balance. But that will not make my body "non genetic" in any way because it is exactly the genetics I carry which allows me to grow big curves and it has made me shorter, changed my eye colour, my hairline, my skin, even the way my skin diseases flare up has changes. My body odour is different, my genitals function differently, HRT reactivated my mensturation and my cycle is like clock work. Am I not then a "genetic female" as the changes have been exogenously given a helping hand?
This is why I think the forum title is problematic. But there is nothing better to replace it, and the term genetic male makes sense in the context we're using it here. The problem is wrong interpretation or malicious use as in trying to get me off the forum as I am not a "genetic male" in the context most are who say they are. But my male characteristics are obviously genetic, goddamn this is so funnily conflicting. lol.
The point being, when debating about human biology, we're complex as fuck and it gets more obscure and strange more closely you look. Especially when it goes to level of genetics which is insanely complex system, I have only surface level and vague understanding of genetics as its such a huge subject. Lotus understands it way better, I miss her badly, she would give such great explanations to all this kinda science geek stuff, I'm sure.
And in case someone wants to categorise trans people as non genetic... There's a nice reply to that.