(15-10-2011, 10:17 AM)beverley.rose Wrote: Also remember that even genetic males have oestrogen in their bodies. Zero oestrogen is not an option for you.
Truly zero isn't an option, I agree, but basic male level oestrogen, even when supplemented by the T converted to E by aromatase when the DHT route is blocked, isn't enough to maintain the PM attained development on its own (hence the need for a maintenance dose of PM), so for practical purposes it can be ignored.
So the questions then are:
1) If RC contains both E and P, how much RC do you need to take to get enough E to maintain what you've got?
2) Is the amount of P that goes with it, in the fixed ratio that is in RC, enough to actually do the rounding out that we are talking about?
3) If it isn't, then how much RC do you actually need to get the P effect, and what then happens about the extra E you've now taken as a side effect, if, as they say, the two are antagonistic?
4) Does the excess E knock out some of the P - in which case do you need more RC to compensate and get the P level back up, leading to more excess E....ad infinitum?
These are almost certainly rhetorical questions because I doubt anyone really knows, even if we were all the same, which we aren't.