19-03-2014, 12:53 AM
An aspect of breast enhancement that can easily be overlooked, particularly by genetic males, is that of overall presentation. A characteristic of the female side profile is what may be termed the bust/butt diagonal, running at an angle to the vertical between the two through the waist line.
I have been finding, after pursuing both weight loss and breast development over most of the past two years with some degree of success, if not as much as I might have liked, that the more obvious fat deposits on my body are now concentrated below my natural but not very evident waist line, defined as a line around my body between the bottoms of the side walls of my rib cage and the iliac crests of my hip bones. This fat should produce some rearward protuberance of my backside below the waist to balance the forward protrusion of my breasts, such as they are.
Unfortunately the effect is rather spoiled by two things. The first, which is a special and rather difficult issue for me to solve, is that I have an incisional hernia between my breastbone and my navel which causes a substantial bulge and increase in girth above my navel. The other is that my considerable height is more in the length of my body than the length of my legs, which means that my waist line is an unusually large distance above my crotch. This in turn means that pants designed to hang from the waist fail to do so, and sit instead above the thigh bones. Although this short rise effect is currently fashionable, it doesn’t look good on a person of my proportions. Worse, it has resulted in development of a constricted ‘belt line’ a few inches below the natural waist line which entirely spoils the shape of my butt. I need to find pants that have a sufficiently high rise to sit reliably at my natural waist line (which is presently significantly larger than my belt line). The problem is even worse when it comes to finding women’s clothes, because even ‘high rise’ waists will not rise high enough.
Any thoughts on solving this second problem, and on getting rid of the ‘belt line’?
I have been finding, after pursuing both weight loss and breast development over most of the past two years with some degree of success, if not as much as I might have liked, that the more obvious fat deposits on my body are now concentrated below my natural but not very evident waist line, defined as a line around my body between the bottoms of the side walls of my rib cage and the iliac crests of my hip bones. This fat should produce some rearward protuberance of my backside below the waist to balance the forward protrusion of my breasts, such as they are.
Unfortunately the effect is rather spoiled by two things. The first, which is a special and rather difficult issue for me to solve, is that I have an incisional hernia between my breastbone and my navel which causes a substantial bulge and increase in girth above my navel. The other is that my considerable height is more in the length of my body than the length of my legs, which means that my waist line is an unusually large distance above my crotch. This in turn means that pants designed to hang from the waist fail to do so, and sit instead above the thigh bones. Although this short rise effect is currently fashionable, it doesn’t look good on a person of my proportions. Worse, it has resulted in development of a constricted ‘belt line’ a few inches below the natural waist line which entirely spoils the shape of my butt. I need to find pants that have a sufficiently high rise to sit reliably at my natural waist line (which is presently significantly larger than my belt line). The problem is even worse when it comes to finding women’s clothes, because even ‘high rise’ waists will not rise high enough.
Any thoughts on solving this second problem, and on getting rid of the ‘belt line’?
