(29-04-2015, 09:14 AM)Miranda-nata-est Wrote: b) You have a full on gender identity crisis which you HAVE to deal with. In this case you have ceded responsibility to your wife to decide what she wants as it is you who have broken the contract. You will probably argue that it is not your fault that you are in this situation, but that is actually immaterial. The best thing you can do, assuming you want to retain some form of relationship with her, is to explain everything again and again but possibly in stages to avoid causing an extreme reaction. Drip feed the revelations and information allowing each step to take root before piling on further bombshells. Expose her to the examples of others who have managed to keep relationships alive - there are a lot of interesting and educational examples out there in internet land. Accept and discuss that your relationship may not be the same as it was and try to map out a new path acceptable to both - there will probably be some compromise here. Above all, don't make the mistake I did which was to seriously, seriously underestimate the degree of adjustment she is having to make. In retrospect now I can see some of what a wife has to go through, I didn't 'get it' at the time. Give it loads of time for her to make the adjustments she needs to - it seems like you have been dealing with this for some time - presumably it is all a bit new to her.
(29-04-2015, 02:57 PM)ClaraKay Wrote: I agree with this advice, and I like the way you stated it, Miranda.
I so have a problem with all this "contract" talk. It's all bullshit, and, as you say, is immaterial. To use the "you violated the contract" argument to coerce certain behavior is not going to accomplish anything meaningful when it comes to being transgender. Always try to work out a problem from where you are at the moment, given the relevant facts at the moment. Assigning blame may make one feel better, or it might justify some unilateral action, but if saving the marriage is the goal, it's best to put it behind you.
Clara
(28-04-2015, 11:11 AM)WantAPair Wrote: [...] The REALLY strange thing is that, in both cases, I was attacked by people that feel they can dress up REALLY strangely ANYTIME they like and EVERYBODY HAS to just deal with them!!!! It's a LIFESTYLE for them!! They are punk rockers!! Oi boys!! Y'know, spiked multi-coloured Mohawks 2 feet high, really bizarre piercings, very loud plaid clothes, the whole ball of wax!! I'M supposed to be COMPLETELY, PERFECTLY accepting of them in this attire/style (and I am!!), but they're in NO way, shape or form going to even CONSIDER being accepting of me wearing a short black skirt and tights or pantyhose!! And, of course, there's the double standard, why is it your wife can wear pants and other men's clothing any time she likes, but you can't dress the LEAST bit fem? It's PERFECTLY okay for Ben Hur and Caligula, among MANY other men throughout history, to wear a skirt, but not for modern day men! I would JUST like to know what goes through peoples' minds when this issue is presented to them, especially via someone they supposedly love!
(29-04-2015, 05:18 PM)ClaraKay Wrote: Miranda, I wasn't suggesting that you were suggesting. Rather, that other posts have been quite fixated on this 'broken contract' idea. It may or may not have been anything intended or foreseen, but it's immaterial at the present time. All kinds of promises are broken within a marriage on all kinds of matters. It comes down to whether a divorce by one or the other spouse is desired or not.
Clara