[The First Aria]

"
I hope this provides an adequate explanation. Btw, iaboy thank you for offering to spare my time. Imo, tumbleweeds = desolation , not the case here. RolleyesBig Grin"

Huh???? Sorry, Wednesday's = a bad Monday in my household. LOL

Spare your time... Hell no slave, get busy. heheheheehe

I think I need tutoring in how to quote several parts of a post and respond to them in one post. On the PhP script I was used to, all you had to do was highlight and hit reply in that post. But here, I cant seem to get the hang of it.

[Wuerstchen]

62.5% in favor so far. Hell, that's even higher than the Greek vote against the bailout package! I am looking forward to the thread!

[The First Aria]

W, lets hope the new section doesn't go the way of the Greek Govt. {going to Hell in a Handbasket}

[breastman59]

Well I am one that has always felt that I was supposed to have,need to have breasts...as long as I can remember felt they should be there...have no desire to transition...just feel that something is missing,has always been missing....can't explain...have tried to reason out in my head...makes no sense...but they ARE supposed to be there....at least in MY head they are...so this is a welcome group....

[The First Aria]

That's sort of along how I feel. If woman can wear boy shirts, short or no hair styles and not wear a dress ever..... Then why cant we "blur" clothing as well as body parts????

[GOboobs]

W, lets hope the new section doesn't go the way of the Greek Govt. {going to Hell in a Handbasket}

Sounds like Lotus is just going to moderate thread(s) that indicate some how as being for those that wish to remain male, not actually create a new section.

[Wuerstchen]

Well I am one that has always felt that I was supposed to have,need to have breasts...as long as I can remember felt they should be there...have no desire to transition...just feel that something is missing,has always been missing....can't explain...have tried to reason out in my head...makes no sense...but they ARE supposed to be there....at least in MY head they are...so this is a welcome group....

Interesting . . . . Well, as a lifelong gynecomastian I have come to believe that a male body with breasts is more interesting--and more fun!-- than one without them. Happily my ex-wife, wife and a girlfriend I had in between marriages all concurred.

[The First Aria]

W, lets hope the new section doesn't go the way of the Greek Govt. {going to Hell in a Handbasket}

Sounds like Lotus is just going to moderate thread(s) that indicate some how as being for those that wish to remain male, not actually create a new section.

The only real problem is that "Wishing to remain Male" with run a whole gamut of topics. From discussions on CD, to pushing the envelope on feminization w/out wrecking male function to Cosmetics, clothing, how to hide breast if needed. God, I could think of 20 or more relevant discussions to being a Girly Boy w/out full transition.

BTW, I hate the pornographic term of Sissy Boy, and Girly Boy, but I guess those are the most descriptive terms I can think of that would be more to the point. ( That could be a topic in new section as well ? )

So, that is the reason for "Male Staying Male Section, or whatever name the majority of contributors would like. I can really only see a new section as being less " Helter Skeltor " to keep most pertinent info in and still be easy to locate.

[GOboobs]

Yes, I don't like the term girly/sissy boy either. Just having breasts does not mean one is either girly or a sissy. If I manage to get the breasts I want, I'll be much more along the lines of Meatloaf's character in Fight Club (His name was Robert Paulson!)

[Scotti]

Interesting . . . . Well, as a lifelong gynecomastian I have come to believe that a male body with breasts is more interesting--and more fun!-- than one without them. Happily my ex-wife, wife and a girlfriend I had in between marriages all concurred.

I concur...my wife loves mine!