Yet another storm in a tea-cup - this time over semantics.
I do think there is a danger that some people have become over sensitised recently and maybe are at times over-reacting.
That there
is a pressing need to clarify the terms used in our world has become very clear in this thread .... this actually proves the validity of the thread. In order to discuss things in any sensible manner without the danger of upsetting anyone, we need to know we are using the same, appropriate vocabulary.
I don't think we should be using dictionary definitions here. They are largely irrelevant. Dictionary definitions inherently lag behind the current usage of language and especially language used in terminology. Technical language and that used in specific communities is the most likely to be 'out of date'. Terminology surrounding the transgender world is still evolving rapidly and, as such, is one example of where dictionary definitions are not so very useful.
I am not sure there is one definitive set of up-to-date terms anywhere but the GLAAD definitions might be common ground we can all adopt in the interests of harmony and understanding?
Here in the UK, a good baseline document can be found at :-
http://www.devonpartnership.nhs.uk/Termi...634.0.html
Funnily enough, this document puts me fairly and squarely on the fence in this discussion (and highlights again the need for a universal, worldwide lexicon)
If we look at the definition of Transsexual, it states categorically that this term is an adjective - by extension, we can make the same assumption about 'transgender'
Quote:-
Transsexual: This is an outdated term that was previously used to a person with a binary experience of gender (“I am a man” or “I am a woman”) that is different from their birth-assigned sex; Trans, Trans person, Trans man, Trans woman are more usually preferred. Transsexual still may be used as an adjective but it is discourteous to use it as a noun when referring to someone.
On the other hand, the NHS glossary whilst on one hand supporting the concept of Transgender as an umbrella term, then goes on to state that Transvestisism does not fall under the transgender label. Maybe the NHS umbrella isn't quite big enough??
There doesn't appear to be absolute agreement amongst the professionals which means that heated argument here over specific terms seems to me to be a bit irrelevant.
As I said at the outset, somehow we really, really do need to all be talking the same language.
Miranda