29-12-2011, 02:28 AM
Hi folks.
There are a number of forums/boards around supporting M2F transexuals and their desires to transition.
Generally I see a lot of support for these individuals, which is welcome, but I am disturbed by what I see as the political correctness of it all.
It seems ok for people to encourage an M2F to transition as fully as possible without any regard to whether they are currently in a happy, heterosexual relationship with a woman.
I am convinced that in order to feminise as much as possible, such people are encouraged by the orthodoxy to go for GRS, as much by peer pressure as anything else.
I don't believe enough support is given (in this country, the UK at least, possibly the US as well) to partial transition; in order to give the appearance as much as possible of feminity but with the physical continuation of an established heterosexual relationship.
I have been accused in another post of possessing a "bias" against "late transitioning M2F transsexuals", because I believe that the mind-altering effects and reduced erection capability caused by estrogen encourages such people to go for full, rather than partial transition, and warning them of this.
I make no apologies for this.
I am fully aware of the enormous effects on my mental state of PM.
I have personal experience of the effect of PM on someone I choose to think of as a friend, Beverley Rose. She herself stated that before taking PM, she only wished to feminise externally, and after she wanted to go for full transition. This is curated fact. Not bias.
I will continue to warn people on this board that they will imperil their marital relationships unless they go carefully with PM; indeed, I feel it is my duty.
I actually care about the wives.
I make no apologies for this.
If people are cynical or p.c. enough to criticise me for this then they can go forth and multiply.
B.
There are a number of forums/boards around supporting M2F transexuals and their desires to transition.
Generally I see a lot of support for these individuals, which is welcome, but I am disturbed by what I see as the political correctness of it all.
It seems ok for people to encourage an M2F to transition as fully as possible without any regard to whether they are currently in a happy, heterosexual relationship with a woman.
I am convinced that in order to feminise as much as possible, such people are encouraged by the orthodoxy to go for GRS, as much by peer pressure as anything else.
I don't believe enough support is given (in this country, the UK at least, possibly the US as well) to partial transition; in order to give the appearance as much as possible of feminity but with the physical continuation of an established heterosexual relationship.
I have been accused in another post of possessing a "bias" against "late transitioning M2F transsexuals", because I believe that the mind-altering effects and reduced erection capability caused by estrogen encourages such people to go for full, rather than partial transition, and warning them of this.
I make no apologies for this.
I am fully aware of the enormous effects on my mental state of PM.
I have personal experience of the effect of PM on someone I choose to think of as a friend, Beverley Rose. She herself stated that before taking PM, she only wished to feminise externally, and after she wanted to go for full transition. This is curated fact. Not bias.
I will continue to warn people on this board that they will imperil their marital relationships unless they go carefully with PM; indeed, I feel it is my duty.
I actually care about the wives.
I make no apologies for this.
If people are cynical or p.c. enough to criticise me for this then they can go forth and multiply.
B.