22-04-2012, 11:31 AM
Sorry for all the medical details, but they are as background for what I am suggesting below.
I was prescribed spironolactone eighteen months ago by a cardiologist for resistant hypertension. With the reading I have now done, it seems that this was to test whether my high BP was caused by aldactone, in which case there should have been a dramatic improvement. There wasn’t, and two weeks later my doctor prescribed a calcium channel blocker which did and has continued to produce a dramatic improvement in average BP, down into the ideal range with dips into very low BP. The day before my next visit to my doctor to report and to renew or adjust my prescriptions, she died suddenly. In the resulting confusion, I had to get my prescriptions renewed by my pharmacist, and I am now under the (very good) care of a nurse-practitioner, having been unable to date to find a replacement family doctor.
Since the original spiro prescription was issued by a specialist, no one has liked to stop it. The spiro has effectively locked out my normal male function, as well as having various other effects and providing a good basis for NBE. It has also helped with my BPH symptoms.
Since finding this board, and with great help direct and indirect, of some of the people here, I have come to realise that the spiro is not a good thiong, and I want to try to reclaim my male function - but without giving up on NBE.
I have an appointment with the cardiologist next Friday. On Wednesday last I ran out of spiro and have not used the renewal of the prescription. I will tell the cardiologist that I have gone off the spiro (no significant change in my BP so far), and also ask to be taken off beta-blockers as well. The NP has already cut my dosage of the latter by 75% to the level it was at before my doctor twice doubled the dose in trying without success to control my then very high BP. This has reduced the dips but paradoxically lowered my average BP well below the normally accepted ideal range. To deal with this she has also halved my dosage of the CCB and another antihypertensive without noticeable effect. I very recently discussed with her whether I could replace the terazosin that is presently prescribed for my BPH with daily Cialis, which was recently approved in the US for treating BPH alone or in combination with ED. She was agreeable in principle, but wants to get the cardiologist’s OK and see my BP a bit higher before issuing a prescription,
On stopping the spiro and thus losing its strong antiandrogen effect and anti-BPH effect, I restarted SP, and also beta-sitosterol, both of which are 5-alpha reductase inhibitors and antiandrogens in that they reduce DHT formation, and thus good for both NBE and BPH. I also learned from the pharmacy the cost of daily Cialis which has rather damped my enthusiasm for it.
Although I will get and hold the Cialis prescription if forthcoming, my present inclination is to follow Bryony’s lead and use Butea Superba and maca in an attempt to restore male function. I have already started taking maca powder from the local bulk food store, and have ordered some red maca which is supposed to be best for ED, and also some Ainterol butea superba (BS).
In the course of my researching these various pharmaceuticals and supplements, various interesting points have emerged.
PM, BS and maca all contain significant amounts of beta-sitosterol. Although I have not been able to find any hard figures for the first two, there is a lot in maca.. Thus they each have a built in 5-alpha reductase inhibitor. On the other hand SP, although said by some to rely on its beta-sitosterol content for its functionality, in fact contains very, very little. This seems to be why some promoters allege that beta-sitosterol is 300 times as powerful as SP. SP must rely on some other constituent.
In view of the beta-sitosterol content of these supplements, I would assume that it is not necessary to take more separately.
BS (and PM and maca) seem likely to provide, like Cialis, some relief from BPH symptoms as well as ED since both Cialis and BS act as PDE5 inhibitors as well as 5-alpha reductase inhibitors.
I was surprised to find that beta-blockers are widely prescribed for anxiety. I found it alleged that nearly half of professional musicians take them to allay performance anxiety. This may explain why I have been so free of anxiety for the last few years despite some considerable external stresses. If I stop, it may be interesting to see what happens.
While some of my proposals could act to increase my BP, it is low enough at present that a modest increase would be a good thing. So far as I can tell, none of the additional supplements is very likely to interfere with NBE.
I am very new to all of this, and if I am wrong or misguided in any of the above,, I hope that some of the very knowledgeable people here will put me right.
I was prescribed spironolactone eighteen months ago by a cardiologist for resistant hypertension. With the reading I have now done, it seems that this was to test whether my high BP was caused by aldactone, in which case there should have been a dramatic improvement. There wasn’t, and two weeks later my doctor prescribed a calcium channel blocker which did and has continued to produce a dramatic improvement in average BP, down into the ideal range with dips into very low BP. The day before my next visit to my doctor to report and to renew or adjust my prescriptions, she died suddenly. In the resulting confusion, I had to get my prescriptions renewed by my pharmacist, and I am now under the (very good) care of a nurse-practitioner, having been unable to date to find a replacement family doctor.
Since the original spiro prescription was issued by a specialist, no one has liked to stop it. The spiro has effectively locked out my normal male function, as well as having various other effects and providing a good basis for NBE. It has also helped with my BPH symptoms.
Since finding this board, and with great help direct and indirect, of some of the people here, I have come to realise that the spiro is not a good thiong, and I want to try to reclaim my male function - but without giving up on NBE.
I have an appointment with the cardiologist next Friday. On Wednesday last I ran out of spiro and have not used the renewal of the prescription. I will tell the cardiologist that I have gone off the spiro (no significant change in my BP so far), and also ask to be taken off beta-blockers as well. The NP has already cut my dosage of the latter by 75% to the level it was at before my doctor twice doubled the dose in trying without success to control my then very high BP. This has reduced the dips but paradoxically lowered my average BP well below the normally accepted ideal range. To deal with this she has also halved my dosage of the CCB and another antihypertensive without noticeable effect. I very recently discussed with her whether I could replace the terazosin that is presently prescribed for my BPH with daily Cialis, which was recently approved in the US for treating BPH alone or in combination with ED. She was agreeable in principle, but wants to get the cardiologist’s OK and see my BP a bit higher before issuing a prescription,
On stopping the spiro and thus losing its strong antiandrogen effect and anti-BPH effect, I restarted SP, and also beta-sitosterol, both of which are 5-alpha reductase inhibitors and antiandrogens in that they reduce DHT formation, and thus good for both NBE and BPH. I also learned from the pharmacy the cost of daily Cialis which has rather damped my enthusiasm for it.
Although I will get and hold the Cialis prescription if forthcoming, my present inclination is to follow Bryony’s lead and use Butea Superba and maca in an attempt to restore male function. I have already started taking maca powder from the local bulk food store, and have ordered some red maca which is supposed to be best for ED, and also some Ainterol butea superba (BS).
In the course of my researching these various pharmaceuticals and supplements, various interesting points have emerged.
PM, BS and maca all contain significant amounts of beta-sitosterol. Although I have not been able to find any hard figures for the first two, there is a lot in maca.. Thus they each have a built in 5-alpha reductase inhibitor. On the other hand SP, although said by some to rely on its beta-sitosterol content for its functionality, in fact contains very, very little. This seems to be why some promoters allege that beta-sitosterol is 300 times as powerful as SP. SP must rely on some other constituent.
In view of the beta-sitosterol content of these supplements, I would assume that it is not necessary to take more separately.
BS (and PM and maca) seem likely to provide, like Cialis, some relief from BPH symptoms as well as ED since both Cialis and BS act as PDE5 inhibitors as well as 5-alpha reductase inhibitors.
I was surprised to find that beta-blockers are widely prescribed for anxiety. I found it alleged that nearly half of professional musicians take them to allay performance anxiety. This may explain why I have been so free of anxiety for the last few years despite some considerable external stresses. If I stop, it may be interesting to see what happens.
While some of my proposals could act to increase my BP, it is low enough at present that a modest increase would be a good thing. So far as I can tell, none of the additional supplements is very likely to interfere with NBE.
I am very new to all of this, and if I am wrong or misguided in any of the above,, I hope that some of the very knowledgeable people here will put me right.