(03-11-2012, 07:58 AM)Wahaika Wrote: Aoz, you are being unreasonable, and the bad language is quite unnecessary.
First, get the facts straight. One has the freedom to destroy their body, but they do not have the right to destroy their body. Does this confuse you? I'm not suprised. You are obviously already confused, in fact, you're mentally ill at best.
How do you know what the qualifications are of anyone here? You don't. And, by the way, one does not need to be an astronomer to declare that the sun rises in the East. Or, is common sense beyond your comprehension?
Your attitude smacks of someone who is defeated. You have obviously given up. It shows in your posts in this thread. Are you of the opinion that you have gone so far down your road that there is no way to reverse your situation? Would you reverse your situation if you could?
Here's a large word for you lexicon: duty. It is our duty to warn those who come here under age of the danger that they are in. Or are you against them having the knowledge of where their actions could lead? Why would you withhold information from them? Don't you think that people should be informed? Without the right information they would surely make the wrong decision. Is that what you want, for them to end up like you?
And yes, unless you have had male parts surgically removed and female parts put in their place (you would still be a male, but with female parts) your situation is quite reversible if you wanted to pursue it.
Wahaika
(03-11-2012, 10:30 AM)AbiDrew85 Wrote:(03-11-2012, 06:42 AM)aoz Wrote: so it's nothing to trifle with, but you trifle with it anyway.....makes sense to me
I don't know where you come off saying this. Have you read anything I've posted? Anything tibetan has posted? Anything mocha has posted? Anything Wahaika has posted? Anything Doll has posted? We all do crazy brick tons of research. We spend more hours studying just what we're doing to ourselves with these supplements than we probably do in any of our other ACTUAL hobbies. Wahaika I think is just someone who is supportive, but tibetan, mocha, and I? We're in this for serious, and we all have legitimate reasons for it. Me, I'm legitimately a transsexual. I can't afford to transition through medical aid. I'm not after just "make my tits bigger" I'm after as thorough a body transformation as I can possibly get. Tibetan and mocha are both older than 25, and both are massively underdeveloped. They too are more in this for balancing their bodies in general, overall sexual wellness, and yes, bigger busts are a big part of that. Doll has PCOS. Do you have any idea what that is? How many doctors out there completely disregard it despite it's major implications on the sufferers sexual health? How expensive that can be to control using the medical communities "standard" channels because the majority of insurances consider it a "cosmetic" treatment? No? Then back the hell off.
I'm sorry if it upsets you, but as Wahaika above me has stated, there's a difference between freedoms and rights, and, under the age of 18, minors do not yet have the RIGHTS to control over their own bodies. They can not legally assign those rights away and agree to a disclaimer. The rights lie with their parents. Who, if something bad happens, can come after Eve, and come after the members of this forum.
Even if that were not true. Young girls should very very rarely if ever need to resort to hormone manipulation of this sort. If they have an imbalance, they are at an age where they can usually correct it with much much gentler nudges. If not, they are covered under insurance. If nothing else women with children and their children are ALWAYS covered under state medical care. If they bother to seek it.
Young boys simply have no business being here unless their parents know they are here and consent and they are being monitored by AT LEAST a mental health professional. They do not yet have the RIGHT to transition. This isn't about whether it's what's right or wrong for them, this isn't about who they are or what's best for their body or ANYTHING. This is about legal responsibility. Young boys are not LEGALLY allowed to be here. Period.
(03-11-2012, 03:11 PM)aoz Wrote: I've done assloads of research too. PCOS is called polycystic ovarian syndrome and is a condition in which there are cysts (almost always benign growths) on the ovaries. this is very often paired with growths in the breasts, and these fibroids are fed by estrogen.
I DO know what I am talking about despite your assumption that I am uneducated
if you think that childeren have no rights because legally until they are eighteen they are slaves to their parents. Just because legal rights don't align with natural rights doesn't mean they don't have natural rights, it just means that an atrocity is being performed by robbing them of their basic human rights
(03-11-2012, 05:06 PM)AbiDrew85 Wrote:(03-11-2012, 03:11 PM)aoz Wrote: I've done assloads of research too. PCOS is called polycystic ovarian syndrome and is a condition in which there are cysts (almost always benign growths) on the ovaries. this is very often paired with growths in the breasts, and these fibroids are fed by estrogen.
I DO know what I am talking about despite your assumption that I am uneducated
if you think that childeren have no rights because legally until they are eighteen they are slaves to their parents. Just because legal rights don't align with natural rights doesn't mean they don't have natural rights, it just means that an atrocity is being performed by robbing them of their basic human rights
I never assumed you didn't know what you were talking about with the hormones themselves. I assumed you didn't know what you were talking about with legal and social ramifications. There's a difference. But yes, I did think that you maybe didn't know about PCOS, it wouldn't make you "ignorant", very few people know a whole lot about it.
As for the difference between basic human rights and legal rights... moot argument. The legal rights trump the human rights, regardless how we may personally feel about that.
You're a very very angry person. I do not understand why you are so angry. I'm still in the middle of the early stages of my transition, and have, from the sounds of things, far more right to be angry than you about life at the moment. But do I sound angry?
Personally, I can understand age of majority laws. While there are youngsters who are extremely smart, there are also youngsters who have absolutely no idea what they are doing and are too damned obstinate to follow reasonable advice.
The same is true of adults, of course, but there has to be a cut-off made where someone becomes responsible for their own stupidity. Most governments have made that 18. Which is reasonable. By then, most people have had enough life lessons to learn to be more patient and "street-smart", whereas below that approximate age, most people have not. Hell. Sometimes I think the age of majority should be 25. But then, some of the mistakes made between 18 and 25 can only BE made by those that are going to insist on making them once they are adults.
(03-11-2012, 05:31 PM)aoz Wrote: I'm not an overly angry person, I'm a crude and passionate one. I speak my mind and will let people like you know when they are being unreasonable. I can't respect someone that puts corrupt politics before natural human rights. I'm sorry for you that your priorities are so jacked up.
And you think you have more to be upset about in life than me, yet you have no idea what I've been through. I've earned everything I have. If you want to be angry because you're jealous because you don't have what I have so be it, but I don't think it's a good idea. Maybe instead of feeling sorry for yourself you should work hard to achieve what you don't have. Earn it. Make progress, not excuses
(03-11-2012, 06:45 PM)AbiDrew85 Wrote:(03-11-2012, 05:31 PM)aoz Wrote: I'm not an overly angry person, I'm a crude and passionate one. I speak my mind and will let people like you know when they are being unreasonable. I can't respect someone that puts corrupt politics before natural human rights. I'm sorry for you that your priorities are so jacked up.If I provide that assistance I then become liable for their actions, and if something bad happens from that, I can get sued or even tried for things like criminal negligence.
And you think you have more to be upset about in life than me, yet you have no idea what I've been through. I've earned everything I have. If you want to be angry because you're jealous because you don't have what I have so be it, but I don't think it's a good idea. Maybe instead of feeling sorry for yourself you should work hard to achieve what you don't have. Earn it. Make progress, not excuses