Abi,
First off let me explain that I am not directly criticising your decision to experiment with self-medicated hormones. My concern is for others, like me, driven here through GD, who, seeing casual discussions of self-medication, will assume it is safe enough and go that route directly. There are two good reasons to discourage this: first is safety, and the other is that using PM (which is safer), may be sufficient to alleviate the GD symptoms.
So, to address your comments:
(12-03-2013, 03:00 AM)AbiDrew85 Wrote: I'm sorry, but if by "UBE" you mean "unnatural", then no, you're wrong. Yes it's pharma. But that's because it's hormones in a concentrated enough form that the FDA has made them a "controlled" substance.
What you are saying is that the drug is bioidentical to that occuring in a female body. It will still have been synthesised though, and it is regulated, because it is potentially dangerous.
Natural to me means, I suppose, that in addition to being something you can harvest, that it is readily available, over the counter, and not dangerous.
Quote:It's not "drugs". It's natural estradiol, just as it's valerate, which splits in the blood into pure estradiol and valeric acid, which is the acid that's added to the estradiol to make it a valerate. Valeric acid is also a completely naturally occurring chemical. And their combination, while not naturally occurring, isn't "strictly unnatural".
Semantics... a drug is not a food and it is used for medical treatment (look up drugs and pharmaceuticals in wiki). As per the "D" in FDA...
Quote:Shoot. The guys part of the forums is under "Related Subjects" wherein lies another topic as well: "Breast Implants and other Surgery" which WOULD be "strictly unnatural."
I agree - but so is any surgery. Once you start on a real transition, then everything becomes unnatural. I wouldn't contemplate it (if I were able to) without planning for extensive facial surgery.
I presume the forum was started for women, and they use "Related Subjects" for everything other than Natural Breast Enlargement for Women.
I'd argue that the men's forum should be under a different level. Maybe there should be a separate sub-forum for DIY Hormone Gamblers, like there is over at Cheryl's.
Quote:Yes, a doctor would be best for this sort of thing. But not all of us can afford them. A supervising doctor would be best for ANY NBE imo. Doesn't change the fact that I can't afford one.
Can you imagine where that kind of thinking goes? Self prescribed antibiotics springs to mind.
Maybe it comes from living somewhere where medicine is only available for the wealthy, but it doesn't make it right.
Quote:Also, "blood clots, strokes, etc" is a bit much. It increases the risks of DVT, a specific type of blood clot that COULD, as all blood clots can, lead to stroke... But it's only an "increased risk" for DVT, and DVT doesn't directly and necessarily immediately mean stroke.
But that increased risk is exactly why it is regulated by the FDA and requires blood work, check-ups, possible orchiectomies, all that sort of thing.
What about these side-effects?
Side Effects
Yes, they may well cause those effects with a small percentage of the population, but that's exactly why a doctor is required to prescribe.
Quote:And there's been no equivalent study done on phyto's, so for all we know we could be doing the same kind of thing there.
Actually there have been studies on PM - look up Google Scholar. It's an incredibly safe
food that contains a bioidentical from of Estriol, the weakest and safest Estrogen - actually seems to protect women from the estroges that cause breast cancer. Look it up.
To my mind there is a reason why this forum was founded and that is to try to grow or enhance breasts without the use of dangerous drugs (dangerous because unsupervised, if you like).
I'm sorry if my disagreement upsets you, but I find this experimenting with regulated drugs to be very risky behaviour; there is a yahoo group that specialises in risk taking: groups.yahoo.com/group/TsDoItYourselfHormones
Obviously, this is only my opinion, but I explained in the opening why I made an issue of it.
Bryony
PS Chrishoney, I'd rather be dramatic and risk averse than hospitalised. Actual risks, by their very nature are hard to quantify, and often wrongly stated on the basis of clinical studies that can be and sometimes are skewed. That's why drugs get withdrawn. I worked for a pharmaceutical for 20 years and saw several drugs get withdrawn due to unforeseen adverse effects.