12-03-2013, 12:29 PM
(12-03-2013, 11:58 AM)bryony Wrote: Abi,
First off let me explain that I am not directly criticising your decision to experiment with self-medicated hormones. My concern is for others, like me, driven here through GD, who, seeing casual discussions of self-medication, will assume it is safe enough and go that route directly. There are two good reasons to discourage this: first is safety, and the other is that using PM (which is safer), may be sufficient to alleviate the GD symptoms.
Uh. I'm here through GD too.
(12-03-2013, 11:58 AM)bryony Wrote: What you are saying is that the drug is bioidentical to that occuring in a female body. It will still have been synthesised though, and it is regulated, because it is potentially dangerous.
Natural to me means, I suppose, that in addition to being something you can harvest, that it is readily available, over the counter, and not dangerous.
Male bodies too... And my definition of natural does not involve being OTC or readily available and I'm not naive enough to believe anything is "not dangerous".
(12-03-2013, 11:58 AM)bryony Wrote: Semantics... a drug is not a food and it is used for medical treatment (look up drugs and pharmaceuticals in wiki). As per the "D" in FDA...
Yes. Legal definition it is a drug. But it's not really a "drug". By my somewhat twisted personal definition of a drug, every single herb we're taking we're taking for their drugs. Legal definition is really even more twisted though. At least my definition is clear-cut if hard to explain. By legal definition saw palmetto is an herb even in extracts, but cannabis is a drug even as a whole plant.
(12-03-2013, 11:58 AM)bryony Wrote: But that increased risk is exactly why it is regulated by the FDA and requires blood work, check-ups, possible orchiectomies, all that sort of thing.
What about these side-effects?
Side Effects
Yes, they may well cause those effects with a small percentage of the population, but that's exactly why a doctor is required to prescribe.
What I find interesting is that every single one of those "side effects" are actually symptoms of mild to severe estrogen dominance with the exception of a few symptoms of DVT.
(12-03-2013, 11:58 AM)bryony Wrote:Quote:And there's been no equivalent study done on phyto's, so for all we know we could be doing the same kind of thing there.
Actually there have been studies on PM - look up Google Scholar. It's an incredibly safe food that contains a bioidentical from of Estriol, the weakest and safest Estrogen - actually seems to protect women from the estroges that cause breast cancer. Look it up.
Actually... It's been compared to both estriol and estradiol and looks chemically like something somewhere between, like if somehow there was a fourth estrogen between E2 and E3, that's what miroestrol would be. Studies I'm talking about are specifically as regards to any increased risk of DVT. There's been NO research as to whether ANY phyto's increase the risk of DVT as is presently assumed that all steroidal estrogens do (which I'm not convinced they actually do, and more recent research is beginning to indicate I may be right and Premarin has done a mighty fine job of convincing everyone that Premarin isn't "that bad" because "all estrogen is the same anyways".
(12-03-2013, 11:58 AM)bryony Wrote: To my mind there is a reason why this forum was founded and that is to try to grow or enhance breasts without the use of dangerous drugs (dangerous because unsupervised, if you like).
I'm sorry if my disagreement upsets you, but I find this experimenting with regulated drugs to be very risky behaviour; there is a yahoo group that specialises in risk taking: groups.yahoo.com/group/TsDoItYourselfHormones
Obviously, this is only my opinion, but I explained in the opening why I made an issue of it.
Bryony
PS Chrishoney, I'd rather be dramatic and risk averse than hospitalised. Actual risks, by their very nature are hard to quantify, and often wrongly stated on the basis of clinical studies that can be and sometimes are skewed. That's why drugs get withdrawn. I worked for a pharmaceutical for 20 years and saw several drugs get withdrawn due to unforeseen adverse effects.
And in my opinion we're all specializing in risk taking. It's just a question of which risks are we willing to take, and why.
There's been discussion lately about the drugs (both legal and my own definition in this case) for anti-t... THAT is something *I* disagree with. Yet IIRC, you didn't complain at all about them discussing those.