I was very impressed by Samantha Rogers’s post (#3 in this thread), both because of the second paragraph and because I can relate strongly to the first paragraph.
I said in JulieTG’s thread ‘Is this most of us? ’that I’m a spectrum person, but in the context of a particular article and diagram which relate to people along a particular gender axis between cross-dressers and transsexuals. In reality our essential selves are molded by a multitude of interacting factors and outside influences, of which gender is only one, so we are indeed all different. But in looking for comfort, and in trying to make order out of chaos, we inevitably draw parallels or speculate, on the basis of what others have chosen to disclose about themselves, how that fits with our own conceptions. For myself I welcome the reaction of others even if I disagree with them since even that still provides insight.
The ‘Is this most of us?’ thread centered on a particular gender axis between cross-dressers and transsexuals (along points on which some people move or flip-flop?). An irony of that is that I am not certain that I even really belong on that axis. At one end I have never really regarded cross-dressing as a practical proposition probably mainly for the for the reason given by Samantha., but also my interest is much more in, at least to a small extent, feeling like and physically functioning and being treated sexually like a woman, than in wearing female clothes or trying to present as female.
At the other end of the axis, there is the fundamental problem as far as I am concerned that, quite apart from my obligations in an existing relationship that is supremely important to me, available transition technology could not get me anywhere near having the functional capability to be fertilized and to reproduce, which as a male I feel I was deprived of, being limited to the fleeting function (now lost to me) of planting my seed; even that I failed to do successfully although I am blessed with two wonderful step children..
I think that I may find growing breasts satisfying because they and other physical feminisation provide elements of feminine function as well as presentation, but who knows?