Omg this question for the millionth time.
Ok ok, I'll try. This is why BO is better and why its not worth mixing them.
1)
Not smart because PM does shitty things with blood clot risk, whereas BO does not or at least there's no anecdotes or proof about it. About PM, there's multiples here on the forum.
2)
Not smart because they compete with same receptors, this one I'm not entirely sure about but it makes sense, PM is phytoestrogen and BO works really well along estradiol, so logic dictates they might create a receptor conflict, in other words become ineffective or cause hormone imbalance.
3)
PM is only midly effective, usually it does nothing or very little, BO on the other hand might be VERY effective to those who benefit.
4)
BO is cheaper
5)
Simple programs which focus on few things that work together is the best. BO can be mixed and matched with a lot from amino acids to weigh cycling, to topical protocol, to conventional HRT and the list goes on. I would not mix PM with almost any of these. So glandular therapy is easy to expand and combine with quite a lot of different approaches.
So, that's what I can think from top of my head right now. I think I can have a say on this based on my experiences. PM just doesn't appear very attractive option in hindsight. When everything else has been better, the choice is obvious. And why mix two things together which might not support each other and one is quite expensive? But the most serious reason why to avoid PM in the first place is blood clot risk. Heck I got a DVT scare too and I have naturally thick blood and I used to smoke back then. In hindsight I should have never touched PM at all, but jump into the HRT + other NBE train right away. But this is all just my view, others may think otherwise.
